“order” means a box quote order or other ordering document agreed to in writing by the parties under this agreement or by customer and a box authorised reseller, which is accepted and provisioned by box as set forth in section 2.2. during the term, box may from time to time provide customer with the right to obtain access for additional users, or features and functionality available in the next level of the box service plan i.e. the customer may lose access to the content during any period of suspension and box shall not be liable for any of its service level commitment that are affected by such suspension. customer will immediately notify box in writing of any unauthorised use of any account, content or the box service that comes to customer’s attention. no title to or ownership of any proprietary rights related to the box service is transferred to customer or any end user pursuant to this agreement or any transaction contemplated by this agreement. in the event that the parties mutually agree in writing to any extension of a subscription period or the provisioning of a box service plan upgrade, customer will pay box the then-current list price for such extension or box service plan upgrade, unless otherwise set forth in the applicable order. for the avoidance of doubt, any discounts offered by box to customer during a prior subscription period will not apply during any new or renewal subscription period unless specifically agreed-to in writing by the parties.

home > digital communications > policies & standards > terms of service agreements > negotiating a terms of service agreement federal-compatible terms of service (tos) agreements are special agreements negotiated between the federal government and many vendors who offer social media, mobile, business and other digital tools. a federal-compatible tos is required for official government use of social media tools that are offered to the agency at no cost. program staff are typically the first to identify innovative third-party tools that may not have an established tos amendment for use by the federal government. there are many reasons why a vendor may be resistant to developing a federal friendly tos (lack of time, priority, legal support, understanding/ familiarity, interest, money, etc.). federal agencies wishing to work with vendors should be prepared to explain the background, importance, and benefits of a federal-friendly terms of service amendment to companies that are unfamiliar with doing business with the federal government after explaining the benefits of adopting a federal-friendly tos amendment, agencies will want to reassure vendors that the process can be simple and speedy.

a terms of use agreement acts as a legally binding contract between you and your customers. using too much technical or legal jargon can be confusing to your users, and in the event of a legal case arising, a judge may find that your agreement is too unclear to be upheld. a separate section discusses surveymonkey’s rights to terminate or suspend accounts for different reasons, and how the company will go about this: as a separate clause, surveymonkey notes how it will handle inactive accounts by emailing users first and then possibly terminating the accounts: similarly to how surveymonkey includes a separate clause for how it handles inactive accounts, buffer has one to address delinquent accounts: one of the great benefits of having a terms of use is that you can limit your legal liability through the agreement.

the decision comes in facebook v. power ventures, a case in which facebook is suing a company that offers a tool for users to access and aggregate their personal information across social networking sites. in other words, it may be a crime to circumvent technological barriers imposed by a website, even if those measures are taken only to enforce the terms of service through code. we welcome the court’s rejection of terms of service violations as triggers for criminal liability, but will continue to work to demonstrate to courts that not all technological measures are created equal.

a terms of service agreement is a document that outlines the rules and guidelines for using your website or app. this agreement is also frequently referred to as terms and conditions or terms of use. by outlining what users can and can’t do on your site or app, a terms of service agreement acts as a contract between site owner and users. because of this, terms of service can help protect you in case of legal disputes. use a terms of service template to outline prohibited user behaviors and rules for your site, then post your final agreement prominently on your website or app. we hope we’ve helped you on your path to making your website or app legally compliant. if you have time, a share would mean a lot to us — don’t forget to @termly_io and use the hashtag #termly! good luck with your business!

the estimated cost of a basic or easy review ranges from $135 to $350. you can specify which terms you would like the attorney to address and explain. the downside is that the attorney will not be looking at the contract in its entirety. the increase in cost is due to your need for an opinion on a particular issue. this could require research and could lead to revisions of the contract. while it may be beneficial to have a complex review of a contract that will be used repeatedly, such as a service contract, a basic or medium review may be all that is needed.

unless you are an attorney or a privacy advocate, you probably do what most people do and quickly scroll through terms of service agreements and privacy policies ignoring the fine print to get registered for a new account. instead, you hereby grant to instagram a non-exclusive, fully paid and royalty-free, transferable, sub-licensable, worldwide license to use the content that you post on or through the service.” social media giants not only have a license to use content that you post, but they are also constantly collecting data on you that you may not realize you are sharing. it can also collect information such as the name of your mobile provider, internet service provider and your language and time zone, according to its data policy.

(1) a definite and seasonable expression of acceptance or a written confirmation which is sent within a reasonable time operates as an acceptance even though it states terms additional to or different from those offered or agreed upon, unless acceptance is expressly made conditional on assent to the additional or different terms. (2) the additional terms are to be construed as proposals for addition to the contract. between merchantssuch terms become part of the contract unless: (3) conduct by both parties which recognizes the existence of a contract is sufficient to establish a contract for salealthough the writings of the parties do not otherwise establish a contract. in such case the terms of the particular contract consist of those terms on which the writings of the parties agree, together with any supplementary terms incorporated under any other provisions of this act.